The Hebraic and Apostolic Origins of the Eucharist: Liturgical Development in the Early Church

Tombs within the Roman Catacombs: The early Christians within Rome used the stone tombs of the martyrs as altars. This custom is thought to trace to the first quarter of the 2nd century. Marble tops were placed upon the tombs for the Mass to be celebrated upon. [SOURCE]

Holy writ tells us that on the night of Passover, Jesus had instituted the sacrament of the Holy Eucharist:

… took bread, blessed and broke it, and gave it to the disciples and said, ‘Take eat; this is My Body.’ Then He took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, “Drink from it, all of you. For this is My blood of the new covenant, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.’

— Matthew 26:26-28.

Being that our Lord and the Apostles were Hebrews, the elements and customs used were Hebraic in nature. More elaborately, the ancient Hebrews would consider meals to be joyful occasions, which would be celebrated within their homes. Church historian Roger T. Beckwith stated that in accordance to the Mishnah:

“grace was said several times at meals, over each main dish, over bread, and over wine; and when people were eating together, most benedictions were said by one person for all, and a responsive grace was added at the end of the meal.”

— Jones, Cheslyn , Geoffrey Wainwright, Edward Yarnold SJ, and Paul Bradshaw, eds. 1992. The Study of Liturgy. Revised. Oxford University Press. Pg. 72. 

The Liturgist and scholar C.P.M. Jones is also in agreement, and even suggested that the singularity of the cup could have been something which originated with Christ Himself: 

The action and words concerning the bread precede the meal; those concerning the cup follow it. This pattern accords well with Jewish meal customs on solemn occasions. The bread-words accompany the normal action over the bread; the wine-words accompany the thanksgiving over the cup. The single, common cup, so essential to the symbolism, may not have been contemporary custom, but Jesus’ own idea.

— Jones, Cheslyn , Geoffrey Wainwright, Edward Yarnold SJ, and Paul Bradshaw. Pg. 195. 

The use of bread and wine in worship is also evident when examining the Old Testament scriptures that were reverenced by the Hebrews. This can be seen in the case of Melchizedek (Genesis 14:18) as well as within the Levitical sacrifices (Leviticus 23:13-37).

Continue reading “The Hebraic and Apostolic Origins of the Eucharist: Liturgical Development in the Early Church”

An Apologia for Iconography

Iconography constitutes a defining element of Orthodox ecclesiastical architecture. The holy icons can be found on walls, ceilings, domes, windows; and are even on liturgical vestments of priests and deacons, the curtain before the altar, bibles & gospel books, and the holy vessels. The icons vary in what they depict, namely; The Holy Trinity, the Incarnate Word -Jesus Christ, St. Mary, the Angels, and the various Saints canonized by the Church. They are rich in color, convey theological truths, and illustrate events from sacred scripture or the lives of the saints.

Because the Orthodox decorate their churches in this fashion, and venerate the persons depicted, charges of idolatry have been made by Non-Believers, namely; Muslims, Jews, Jehovah’s Witnesses, certain Protestant sects, and the like. In the case of the said groups who uphold the Bible to be authoritative, with the exception of Islam, they refer to Sacred Scripture and accuse the Orthodox of not following the Bible and God’s Holy Commandments. A common source for their claim is Exodus 20:2-6, which we will review in detail briefly.

It is worth noting that, for the Orthodox, the charges of idolatry are appalling and even offensive to pious ears. This is because the Church, being the Body of Christ, confesses the Holy Scriptures to be Divinely Inspired, Inerrant, and Infallible. Wherefore, to the Church, the faith revealed by God through the Bible is without compromise (c.f. 2 Timothy 3:16).

Thus, the Holy Church continues in its sacred doctrines, especially regarding there being One God: The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, One in Essence. This was the faith by which the Apostles, Confessors, Martyrs, and Early Church Fathers diligently taught, preserved, and defended; even to the point of blood.

Granted, because the Church is careful in her reverence for the sacred scriptures and the persons who preserved the true faith that can be found within them; then she also cares for the very teachings of the same persons that handed down the spotless dogmas to us. This is what earns the Church the title: “Orthodox”. This also explains why the Church professes the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed every Sunday to disqualify any idea of there another God, as polytheism conflicts with Church dogma and the Gospel Message at large.

Continue reading “An Apologia for Iconography”