Faith Unto Ages

An Apologia for Iconography

Iconography constitutes a defining element of Orthodox ecclesiastical architecture. The holy icons can be found on walls, ceilings, domes, windows; and are even on liturgical vestments of priests and deacons, the curtain before the altar, bibles & gospel books, and the holy vessels. The icons vary in what they depict, namely; The Holy Trinity, the Incarnate Word -Jesus Christ, St. Mary, the Angels, and the various Saints canonized by the Church. They are rich in color, convey theological truths, and illustrate events from sacred scripture or the lives of the saints.

Because the Orthodox decorate their churches in this fashion, and venerate the persons depicted, charges of idolatry have been made by Non-Believers, namely; Muslims, Jews, Jehovah’s Witnesses, certain Protestant sects, and the like. In the case of the said groups who uphold the Bible to be authoritative, with the exception of Islam, they refer to Sacred Scripture and accuse the Orthodox of not following the Bible and God’s Holy Commandments. A common source for their claim is Exodus 20:2-6, which we will review in detail briefly.

It is worth noting that, for the Orthodox, the charges of idolatry are appalling and even offensive to pious ears. This is because the Church, being the Body of Christ, confesses the Holy Scriptures to be Divinely Inspired, Inerrant, and Infallible. Wherefore, to the Church, the faith revealed by God through the Bible is without compromise (c.f. 2 Timothy 3:16).

Thus, the Holy Church continues in its sacred doctrines, especially regarding there being One God: The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, One in Essence. This was the faith by which the Apostles, Confessors, Martyrs, and Early Church Fathers diligently taught, preserved, and defended; even to the point of blood.

Granted, because the Church is careful in her reverence for the sacred scriptures and the persons who preserved the true faith that can be found within them; then she also cares for the very teachings of the same persons that handed down the spotless dogmas to us. This is what earns the Church the title: “Orthodox”. This also explains why the Church professes the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed every Sunday to disqualify any idea of there another God, as polytheism conflicts with Church dogma and the Gospel Message at large.

The Superiority of Biblical Cosmology over Pagan Creation Myths

Throughout history, man has made attempts to explain the origin of all things. This is evident when examining the various cosmological stories of antiquity, such as in the case of the ancient Egyptians and Babylonians who attributed the birth of existence to various deities. These deities had fallen human characteristics, ambitions, and interests.

To cite Holmon’s Quicksource:

“Egyptian and Babylonian (as well as the earlier Sumerian) creation myths were inherently polytheistic, with teeming masses of powerful but flawed gods competing for the spotlight… cohabitations, base motives, and warring between the chief gods led to the incidental creation of other gods as well as the earth, sky, sea, and all living things”

– Whorton, Mark S, and Hill Roberts. Holman Quicksource Guide to Understanding Creation. Nashville, Tennessee, Holman Reference, 2008, 41-42.

These deities of the said groups were not only limited, as they wrestled “with eternal matter to fashion heaven and earth” (Whorton, 37) but were unjust and grudging against the human race. For instance, the Babylonian Enuma Elish tells that the human race was created from the blood of the defeated Kingu, who was seen as being the commander of demons, from the underworld, and an enemy to “superior” deities. Consequently, a personal and loving relationship between humanity and the gods was lacking; as they were created not only as a result of conflict, but to perform difficult labors of the gods such as building, digging, etc.

On the contrary, the Holy Scriptures speak of there being One God that is completely good, just, eternal, omnipotent, sovereign, unlimited, and sacred. As such, He was not in need of any other assistance, nor in need of pre-existent matter to create; as He made all things out of nothing by His Word. The idea of a deity needing pre-existent matter was one shared with, and perhaps adopted, by Plato.

St. Athanasius’ Defense of Jesus’ Role as Messiah & the Conversion of the Gentiles

A form of argumentation that was used by St. Athanasius to defend Jesus’ Messiahship against the Jews was by appealing to the conversion of Gentiles; who began to forsake their idols and acknowledge the true God of Israel. This was a fulfillment of Old Testament prophecy, which morally held Jews to accept the undeniable evidence that Jesus is the Christ; as the scriptures are held to be authoritative by both Jews and Christians alike.

In his words:

“… when they see even heathens deserting their idols, and placing their hope, through Christ, on the God of Israel, do they deny Christ, Who was born of the root of Jesse after the flesh and henceforth is King? For if the nations were worshipping some other god, and not confessing the God of Abraham and Isaac and Jacob and Moses, then, once more, they would be doing well in alleging that God had not come. But if the Gentiles are honoring the same God that gave the law to Moses and made the promise to Abraham, and Whose word the Jews dishonored, why are they ignorant, or rather why do they choose to ignore, that the Lord foretold by the Scriptures has shone forth upon the world, and appeared to it in bodily form?”

~ On the Incarnation, CHAPTER VI.